Subchondroplasty Procedure for Insufficiency Fracture

The following information is attributed to Radiopedia.org 

* The boxes below contain information specifically for our patients.  Please click on the boxes to learn more. 

Subchondral insufficiency fracture of the knee (SIF/SIFK) are stress fractures in the femoral condyles or tibial plateau that occur in the absence of acute trauma, typically affecting older adults.

Terminology

The entity subsumes that previously known as spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee (SONK/SPONK) or Ahlbäck disease. Recognizing that spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee was a misnomer and actually represents a subchondral insufficiency fracture that progressed to subchondral collapse with secondary osteonecrosis, the Society of Skeletal Radiology Subchondral Bone Nomenclature Committee recommended that "subchondral insufficiency fracture" be the preferred term 17.

Epidemiology

Subchondral insufficiency fracture of the knee is seen more frequently in women (M:F 1:3) and affects older patients, typically over the age of 55.

Clinical presentation

Patients often recall an acute onset of severe pain without significant trauma.

Pathology

By definition, secondary osteonecrosis of the knee occurs secondary to an insult. Subchondral insufficiency fracture of the knee is not thought to be caused by bone death but instead by osteoporosis and insufficiency fractures, with histopathologically proven origins in weakened trabeculae and applied microtraumatic forces 6,13.

Radiographic features

It is almost always unilateral, usually affects the medial femoral condyle (but can occasionally involve the tibial plateau 9) and is often associated with a meniscal tear

Plain radiograph

In the later stages features seen include:

  • flattening of the medial femoral condyle

  • subchondral radiolucent focus

  • complicating subchondral fracture with periosteal reaction

Classification

On radiographs the Koshino classificiation is sometimes used which is as 18

  • stage I: normal radiograph

  • stage II: radiolucency in subchondral weight-bearing area

  • stage III: expanded lucent area surrounded by sclerosis, subchondral bone collapse

  • stage IV: osteophytes and osteosclerosis on affected condyle

MRI

Features can vary depending on the stage and are best characterized on T2-weighted and proton density-weighted sequences. The following criteria apply to lesions without overlying cartilage abnormalities:

  • subchondral bone plate fracture 13

    • in the weight-bearing area of the involved condyle

    • subtle flattening or a focal depressive deformity

    • an irregular, discontinuous hypointense line in the subarticular marrow, representing callus and granulation tissue

    • there may be a fluid-filled cleft within the subchondral bone plate (poor prognostic factor) 13

    • excavated defect of the articular surface (advanced cases)

  • focal subchondral area of low signal intensity subjacent to the subchondral bone plate representing local ischemia (considered most important in early lesions and a specific MRI finding 12)

    • this area shows no enhancement on post-contrast; if it is thicker than 4 mm or longer than 14 mm, the lesion may be irreversible and may evolve into irreparable epiphyseal collapse and articular destruction

    • appears as a thickened subchondral bone plate, which represents a fracture with callus and granulation tissue and secondary osteonecrosis in the subarticular region 13

  • ill-defined bone marrow edema and a lack of peripheral low signal intensity rim as seen in osteonecrosis and bone infarcts

Associated features that may predict prognosis include:

  • associated meniscal tear and degree of extrusion

  • chondrosis severity

Treatment and prognosis

Prognosis varies from complete recovery to total joint collapse 2. Treatment can either be operative or non-operative, with initial treatment often conservative and consisting of analgesia and protected weight bearing. Subchondral hypointense fracture lines tend to resolve with conservative therapy. In more advanced cases, subchondroplasty (where a bone substitute is injected) may be considered.

Differential diagnosis

Possible considerations include:

History and etymology

It was first systematically described by Ahlbäck in 1968 2.